Jigsaw Puzzles and Genealogy Research – Solution Challenges




During my years as a genealogy researcher, I have compared research to the serious practice of working jigsaw puzzles. All the puzzle pieces clearly present the need for analysis and development of solutions. Albeit, the two activities differ in some ways, I share common elements between the two that contribute to successful solutions in puzzle work and genealogy research.

Engaging in jigsaw puzzle work involves handling numerous (hundreds or thousands) pieces and limited clues relative to accurately fitting respective pieces into the whole. An effective way to begin the puzzle work is reviewing a picture of the “finished” product and using this as a guide. For puzzle enthusiasts, the work is challenging and time-consuming, but also captivating. The activity presents a great opportunity to practice mindfulness by employing focus, evaluation and analytical practice. Upon completion, a finished product exists, demonstrating persistence and patience exercised during the puzzle process.

Similar to jigsaw puzzlers, genealogy researchers face challenges, working with limited leads and the need to analyze and validate relevant family data for inclusion in a comprehensive family history. Dedicated researchers definitely utilize mindfulness to maintain focus while identifying and managing data, leads and inconsistencies. Research is also time-consuming, challenging and captivating.

“Working” a jigsaw puzzle and conducting genealogy research are similar in the required time, evaluation, analysis and discernment used during both activities. While jigsaw puzzle work and genealogy research are not precise equivalents, the evaluation and analytic process for each is comparable in several ways, and reminds us how diligence is rewarded in producing valid results.

  •         A comprehensive puzzle image represents a guide to follow toward completion. The genealogy research process lacks the one comprehensive guide and involves clues and leads for numerous family branches to assist us in creating a comprehensive result or image. In research, we have guideposts along the way to channel our efforts along relevant paths. In this respect, genealogy research includes images or comprehensive guides, similar in theory to the completed picture used by jigsaw puzzle workers.
  •        In both endeavors, we may “freelance”, disregarding any guides as we embark on solving the jigsaw or genealogy puzzle. Experience proves this option is more time-consuming, frustrating and counter-productive when in either activity.
  •         Some clues to solution are relatively straightforward as in following the shape and coloring of edge-line puzzle pieces, or identifying evidence that directly relates to and includes documented sources for our compiled family records.
  •         Numerous other puzzle pieces or data require evaluation and analysis of the current comprehensive work and possible solutions or clues, and developing tactical or strategic steps toward continued puzzle completion or relevant research planning to find and validate additional genealogical family data.

Common requirements with jigsaw and research processes are patience, perseverance and objective discernment. Some pieces or research clues prove to be valid “fits” to the puzzle. Even more pieces or research clues require analysis and “trial runs” to determine the validity of placement.

Although genealogy research activity can be ongoing, the satisfaction of identifying a new family branch or significant source records to validate information is certainly equivalent with fulfillment felt by those who successfully complete complicated jigsaw puzzles. The time commitment, focus and analysis are well-placed elements for puzzle workers, whether jigsaw or genealogy.


Copyright © Denyce Peyton 2013. All rights reserved.
Posted in Professional genealogy research, consultation and workshop experience | Leave a comment

Why Do You Research?

We can address family history research from a couple of perspectives. One is the process of collecting existing information about family members, dates and events. Usually, we begin with living family members and information they possess from family oral or written stories, records, diaries, etc. This is “beginning with what you know”. A second process of research is to investigate relevant records that support your existing family data, through census records, vital records, court records and other record types. The purpose of retrieving records to support your family-held information is to validate that names, events, dates and other data are accurate in terms of what, when and how your family’s history was created. In developing our family history, it is important to confirm that our information is an accurate representation of our family, and not that of other’s with similar names, dates and locations.

Both processes are important in developing our family history. Collecting family information identifies and maintains record of individuals and families in a structured format. The investigation process enhances research by providing evidence, validating data and establishing trails for further research.

As you proceed in your family history research, consider incorporating both of the above processes to support an effective and enlightening genealogy path to Family Discovery!

Copyright 2011-2012 Denyce Peyton. All rights reserved.
Posted in Professional genealogy research, consultation and workshop experience | Leave a comment